The statement that stack, brief, mark, and control remain unchanged when handing off to a FAC(A) is true or false?

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Not enough information
• D. Partially true

Answer: (B)

The key idea is that handing off to a FAC(A) is a transfer of authority and the tactical picture, not a simple one-to-one handover of every detail. When the airborne FAC(A) takes over, the stack of targets, the brief given to guide the attack, the marking method, and the control parameters all may need to be updated to fit the FAC(A)’s position, sensors, and plan.

The engagement stack can be re-prioritized or reorganized by the new controller based on their assessment and the airspace/targeting situation. The brief may be refreshed to reflect what the FAC(A) can observe from their altitude and platform, and to incorporate any new constraints or threats. The mark often must be re-established because the FAC(A) might have a different line of sight, different marking methods, or different guidance cues available. And control authority definitely shifts to the FAC(A); they will issue the terminal attack guidance and release parameters, so the exact way the attack is controlled can change.

Because these elements are not guaranteed to stay the same, the statement is false.